Stop Shipping
Buggy Code.
Your AI wrote the code. Who checked it?
SecureCode independently verifies AI-generated code: it finds the exploitable flaw, writes the patch, and tries to break the patch before you ship.
1const email = req.query.email;2const q = `SELECT * FROM users3 WHERE email = '${email}'`;
AI made shipping faster.
It didn’t make the code safer.
AI can produce code that looks completely correct: it compiles, it passes review, it ships. The vulnerability isn’t a typo you can spot. It’s a trusted assumption that doesn’t hold, and nothing independent ever checked it.
Four agents. One security decision.
Find the hole. Write the patch. Try to break it. One continuous system: each stage feeds the next, the last one proves the fix.
Simplified overview. Inconclusive findings go to a local human review queue before you ship.
Scout
Find suspicious code.
Juror
Determine whether the vulnerability is real and exploitable.
Fixer
Generate an applyable patch and re-run the exploit against it.
Attacker
Try to break the patch.
Warnings are cheap.
Verified fixes aren’t.
1app.get("/user", (req, res) => {2 const id = req.query.id;3 const row = db.exec(4 "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id=" + id5 );6 res.json(row);7});
1app.get("/user", (req, res) => {2 const id = Number(req.query.id);3 if (!Number.isInteger(id))4 return res.status(400).end();5 const row = db.exec(6 "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id=$1", [id]7 );8 res.json(row);9});
Not another security dashboard.
The only layer that carries a finding all the way to a fix it has already tried, and failed, to break.
Whatever writes your code.
SecureCode protects it.
Connect SecureCode to the AI tools you already use. If it supports MCP, SecureCode can become your independent security verification layer.
Your AI writes the code. Your agent requests the check. You approve it. SecureCode independently verifies it.
1import { jwt } from "./jwt"23export async function authenticateUser(token: string) {4 const decoded = jwt.verify(token, SECRET)5 return await getUser(decoded.id)6}
SecureCode via MCP
Connect SecureCode to Cursor using the SecureCode MCP server. Your agent can request a scan. You approve it. Then it runs.
$ Command Palette→ SecureCode: Show MCP SetupPaste the generated snippet into .cursor/mcp.jsonReload the window
Nothing runs until you approve it.
Connecting an agent does not give SecureCode permission to run. The agent requests. You approve. Then it executes.
Your full repository stays on your device. SecureCode processes only the selected file and optional related context needed for verification.
You control related-file uploads, secret-file skipping, and sandbox AI adjudication. Nothing is used for AI training.
- Scan requires approval
- Verification requires approval
- Agent actions require approval
- Nothing runs automatically
Works with any MCP-compatible agent
Your AI wrote it. SecureCode verified it.
Your stack. Already supported.
Security verification for the way software is written now.
- 3 scan credits
- 1 free Attacker Mode run (20 credits)
- Real-time SAST
- Dependency checking
- Fix previews
- Up to 200 AI security scans / month
- 15 AI-generated fixes / month
- Real-time static analysis
- MCP integration
- Cursor / Claude Code support
- Attacker Mode add-on ($5/run)
- Priority support
Top up whenever you need additional security checks.
- 50 credits$15
- 150 credits$42
- 400 credits$108
- 1,000 creditsBest value$249
Stress-test the fix.
Most security tools stop at detection. SecureCode goes further: Attacker Mode actively tries to bypass the generated fix before you trust it.
If the attack succeeds, the patch goes back to Fixer for a new attempt. The loop repeats until the fix holds.
Straight answers.
Yes. SecureCode runs today as an MCP server and editor extension inside Cursor, VS Code, and Claude Code. Install it, point it at your code, and run a verification.